Well, let's first answer this question: Where is the Web Going?
Nir Eyal - who is a behavioural engineer - wrote that "disruptive web innovation comes from changes in interface".
Foursquare, in a way or another, is not any different from Google Latitude when it comes to their basic functionality which is sharing your location with friends. So are Gmail vs Hotmail. Yet almost everyone I know uses Foursquare and Gmail, and I can't think of any of my friends who uses Latitude or still uses Hotmail.
What's Tumblr but yet another blogging platform, yet it almost kicks the ass of many of the existing platforms when it comes to the number of users and published content there.
Can you define Pinterest? Probably it's a mixture of a social-bookmarking service a la Del.icio.us and something like 9Gag. Right? So why are some service on a rise while others are pretty dead, given they basically are doing the same thing?
I can't deny that marketing plays a big role in that. But also Interface and User Experience are the kings here. It's the user experience an applications gives to you that encourages you to interact more or less with it. Let me quote Nir Eyal one more time here.
The percentage of users creating content is a function of users’ ability. That is to say, the easier it is to create content the more people create it. But why should we care about content creation? Because content creation has exponential benefit to the community and is by definition how online media platforms succeed.
And that's why Design Thinking is on a rise, which Paula Thornton defined as, "Design thinking is not about solving design problems, it’s about solving problems with design".
The Web is Fragmented
But the ease of creating new content comes at an expense. There is too much content nowadays, and it makes our lives harder to find the useful needle in that social-media haystack.
The web is fragmented. That fragmentation gave rise to search. And it’s given rise to the role of social within finding.
The ‘finding’ problem exacerbates as content / product grows. Great examples of the problem: eBay, Amazon and iTunes have nearly unlimited inventory and are often painful to explore (for that precise reason).
Web 1.0 => Social Web => Curated Web
Nir Eyal continued to explain the idea in his blog:
That’s exactly the cry the founders of companies like Pinterest, Evernote and Tumblr are answering. These companies mark the dawn of what I call the Curated Web.What does this mean? Where do those curators come from?
The Curated Web is characterized by a fundamentally different value to users than the social web. Whereas Web 1.0 was characterized by content published from one-to-many and social media was about easily creating and sharing content, from many-to-many, the curated web is about capturing and collecting only the content that matters, from many-to-one. Like all successive phases, the curated web is a response to the weaknesses of the previous phase.
In her blog post, Lauren Picarello defined three categories of content curation, however I'd like to focus on two of them here:
Consumers as curators: Everything is curated now. We view the world through filters – trusted sources like friends or online communities to which we belong. ‘I want to look at topic X through your lens because you are someone I trust.’
Brands as content: This one is simple. Consumers use your brands to express themselves.Therefore brands have to provide variety and portability if they want to show up in their customers’ content stream. By allowing people access to the raw material of your brand, they can better identify with your products and amplify your messages.For example, many consumers “Like” brands on Facebook because they want that particular brand to show up as part of their profile. In a sense, ‘brands as content’ is why social media has been able to become such a force in our everyday lives.
Is Curation the Next Big Thing? Does this mean the Web2.0 is dead?
Yuri Milner, a popular Russian Internet investor who has invested in Facebook, Groupon, and Zynga, says the next space he's looking at is Curation, "With the number of sources, and doubling of information every 18, 24 months [Moore's law]. I think the next big thing is curation".
But no, this doesn't mean that Web2.0 is dead, not at all. In fact those waves of trends are so overlapping that it's hard to tell when one of them starts and when one ends. Let's take twitter as an example, on one hand it's a sort of curation tool, where your friend read the news sources for you, filter the important ones and feed them into your timeline. But on the other hand, with the loads of tweets you get into your timeline, you need an extra layer of curation to aggregate only those important tweets to you. And this is where the likes of Storify and Curated.by were born. I'll go into twitter and the curation trends there in more details later on, but what I wanted to say is that it's like layers of user-generated content and curation on top of each other, curation is a user-generated thing by the way. So neither Curation was born, nor Web2.0 is dead, we are just witnessing those layers of user-generated content and curation being added on top of each other day after day according to the consumers' needs.
Twitter Search Sucks!
Now let me end the post with some examples, and let's start with twitter. We all know how hard it is to find a tweet. Maggie McGary (@maggielmcg) who is online community & social media manager; gave an example to how hard it is to find tweets.
Take the tragedy in Haiti. Mainstream media is featuring Twitter as an integral part of the Red Cross's efforts to raise an amazing amount of money in record time and through previously untapped channels. So what happens a month or six months from now when a reporter is tasked with researching the total number of tweets containing the words "Haiti" or "Red Cross" in the weeks after the earthquake? I'll tell you what will happen: nothing, as in "no results," because those search results will be long gone.
A part of our job in Global Voices Online is to "work together to bring you reports from blogs and citizen media everywhere, with emphasis on voices that are not ordinarily heard in international mainstream media", i.e. curation. And we once had a discussion about the different types of twitter-curation and the below table was my $0.02 in the discussion.
and many others, means one thing, people are in need of Curatiom.
Finally, I'd like to add two/three more examples. Tumblr and Pinterest on one hand can be seen as both Curation tools or new/simpler Blogging platforms. Focusing on one aspect of them and ignoring the other means that you will probably miss their value and won't be able to understand their sweet spot. The real value of those two tools is that they combine the beauty of both curated web and the simplicity of web2.0 where user content can be added easily. The third example here is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a decade-old platform and guess what, it's a sort of curation platform. Whenever you add new information there, you are asked to add reference to it, so basically you are just curation the content in those references and putting them together in more organized and easier to find articles. Sure, it's not just curation, but I am just trying to prove to you that curation is not really a new trend as you might think.